Welcome to facenotee👍🏿

FINANCIAL CONFESSIONS

I am mindful of my divine provisions which Christ has made available to me in abundance. My mind is alert to receive ideas from God and take advantage of opportunities He presents to me for wealth generation. In whatever that I do, I doubtless come back rejoicing, bringing supernatural profits. The lines are fallen unto me in pleasant places, yes, I have a goodly heritage. I am feeding on the heritage of Jacob. Glory!

I do not cease from generating mega profits. It is my hour and my season to rule and dominate financially. I take advantage of the intense treasures and blessings of the Christ life. I refuse to be intimidated or swayed by the obnoxious laws and policies enacted. I am like a tree planted by the rivers, I do not see when heat comes

I have grace for wealth, riches and fortunes. My confidence to succeed and flourish in this life is in observing financial principles in the Word of God; that never fail but abides forever. That which I give comes back to me, a good measure, pressed down, shaken together and running over. My bank accounts are overflowing with plenty of money, my investments and savings are growing exponentially, by the Spirit of God. Hallelujah!

facenotee

2 responses to “FINANCIAL CONFESSIONS”

  1. mosckerr avatar
    mosckerr

    A foreign‑policy civil war inside the American right

    Neo-Con opposition to Trump 2.0 Campaigned “to stop all wars”. Meaning eternal wars – Korea, Vietnam, Afghanistan wars – his primary concern. To sum up Trump 2.0 טוב מיעט ממיעט טוב – Better a little good, than allot not good. Better a reliable Israeli ally than a lot of EU back stabbers. Trump 2.0 remembers the Yom Kippur oil embargo and the recent BRICS replacement policy. His destruction of both Venezuela and Iranian oil threats defines his vision of America First.

    Neo Con vs. Trump 2.0: Two very different foreign‑policy traditions now coexist — and clash — inside the American right. Neo‑conservatism emerged in the late 20th century and became especially influential after 9/11. Bush campaigned against the US maintaining a “Nation Building” Foreign Policy. VP ‘Dick’ Chaney defines the Neo Con agenda. The Democrat Clinton/Obama Administrations both promoted the Bush 1.0 ”New World Order” international alliance as the Top US strategic foreign policy.

    Neo-Con notions of spreading “the Good News” & “converting” foreign nations to embrace “democracy and democratic values” negates the classic foreign policy of trading with foreign nations as the central theme of Strategic US Foreign policy. Prior to the post WWII Pax American Empire, virtually all US Administrations focused upon building Universities rather than selling military equipment to foreign nations. Candace Owens expressed support for the post-9/11 invasion of Iraq, a necessary action in response to terrorism. Hashtag rapid rate opinionism. The USS Liberty no black Americans killed; yet hashtag Owens jabbers about the USS Liberty as if an event 22 years before her birth qualifies as a MAJOR black American issue today.

    Like

    Reply
    1. mosckerr avatar
      mosckerr

      PM Begin returned Sinai & PM Sharon returned Gaza because neither this nor that lands – Sinai nor Gaza – not included within the borders of either the First or Second Republic. Tucker Carlson Neo Con ideology rejects the leadership of Team Trump.

      The Labor leader in this pic,(see home page) has no more reliable ability to capture the Premiership than the Neo Cons convince President Trump that he should embrace their eternal war, US policeman of the Planet – Neo Con tenets of faith! The clip below, therefore represents a blood libel. PM Begin returned Sinai & PM Sharon returned Gaza because neither this nor that – Sinai nor Gaza – included within the borders of either the First or Second Republic. Both Bush 1 & 2, Clinton, Obama, Hillary, Pelosi etc defined their vision of the New World Order as – promoting multilateralism, international alliances, and global cooperation. Not so Team Trump’s America First.

      All nations throughout history, shape and determine their international borders – based upon Wars either won or lost. The 1846 Mexican American war definitively proves this fact. The Youtube propaganda “Israel’s borders not set in stone”, confuses the stone Sinai tablets with the international borders of the Jewish state! Post ’67 UN 242 England and France attempted to determine the international boundaries, and location of Israel’s Capital. Post ’73 Yom Kippur War both England and France criticized UN 338’s “failure” to directly mention a Palestinian state. UN 2334, Obama followed this “Leash -line”, hostile European imperialism!

      Israel as a nation, our wars determine our borders. No different than that of North Ireland “illegally occupied” (a propaganda language) by Britain. Its not the place of the UN or any country who does not share a common border with Israel, to presume that they predetermine Israeli strategic diplomacy. Israel shares nothing in common with Calvinist predetermination dogmatism. Pie in the Sky “International Law” does not determine legality or illegality of wars won or lost. War, defined by risk and consequences.

      Like

      Reply

Leave a comment